@article {548571,
	title = {In vivo muscle function vs speed. II. Muscle function trotting up an incline},
	journal = {J Exp BiolJ Exp BiolJ Exp Biol},
	volume = {208},
	number = {Pt 6},
	year = {2005},
	note = {Wickler, Steven JHoyt, Donald FBiewener, Andrew ACogger, Edward ADe La Paz, Kristin LengS06 GM53933/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/Comparative StudyResearch Support, U.S. Gov{\textquoteright}t, P.H.S.England2005/03/16 09:00J Exp Biol. 2005 Mar;208(Pt 6):1191-200.},
	month = {Mar},
	pages = {1191-200},
	abstract = {Different locomotor tasks, such as moving up or down grades or changing speed, require that muscles adjust the amount of work they perform to raise or lower, accelerate or decelerate the animal{\textquoteright}s center of mass. During level trotting in the horse, the triceps had shortening strains of around 10.6\% while the vastus shortened 8.1\% during the stance phase. Because of the 250\% increase in metabolic rate in horses trotting up a 10\% incline which is, presumably, a result of the increased requirement for mechanical work, we hypothesized that muscle strain during trotting would be increased in both the triceps and the vastus over that observed when trotting on the level. Because times of contact are similar in level and incline trotting, we also hypothesized that strain rates of these muscles would be increased, accompanied by an increase in EMG activity. We examined the lateral head of the triceps and the vastus lateralis while trotting up a 10\% incline (5.7 degrees) over a range of speeds. The triceps shortened by 18\% compared with 10.6\% shortening on the level, and the vastus shortened by 18.5\% compared with 8.1\% on the level. The increased shortening velocities that were observed in both muscles probably reduced the force that any given set of activated muscle fibers could produce. If this pattern held for other limb muscles that do work to elevate the horse{\textquoteright}s center of mass on an incline, then a greater volume of muscle would have to be recruited to generate an equivalent force for body support. This was reflected in significant increases in the EMG intensity (IEMG) of both muscles.},
	keywords = {Analysis of Variance, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electromyography, Energy Metabolism/physiology, Forelimb/physiology, Hindlimb/physiology, Horses/*physiology, Joints/physiology, Locomotion/*physiology, Muscle Contraction/*physiology, Muscle, Skeletal/*physiology},
	isbn = {0022-0949 (Print)0022-0949 (Linking)},
	author = {Wickler, S. J. and Hoyt, D. F. and Biewener, A. A. and Cogger, E. A. and De La Paz, K. L.}
}
